<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPsec VTI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/</link>
	<description>CCNA, CCNP, CCVP, Security Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-460</guid>
		<description>think so, à vérifier. 

Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think so, à vérifier. </p>
<p>Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-458</guid>
		<description>dit-il 3 mois plus tard :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dit-il 3 mois plus tard :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmigette</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>bmigette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-457</guid>
		<description>bah le multicast pour IPSEC est permis par l&#039;utilisation des VTI, qui sont des interfaces routables, et ou donc le multicast peut transiter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bah le multicast pour IPSEC est permis par l&#8217;utilisation des VTI, qui sont des interfaces routables, et ou donc le multicast peut transiter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benoit</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Nice le new design ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice le new design <img src='http://www.madrouter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Tu parles des profiles VTI

je te parle des tunnel GREoIPsec... 

wtf ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tu parles des profiles VTI</p>
<p>je te parle des tunnel GREoIPsec&#8230; </p>
<p>wtf ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bastien</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-417</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-403&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-403&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;alex&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
think so, à vérifier. 
Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
haha mec t&#039;es pas au points sur tes versions d&#039;IOS :p
irtual Tunnel Interface

VTI is introduced in Cisco IOS Release 12.3(14)T. A tunnel interface with the new Cisco IOS interface tunnel mode ipsec ipv4 command along with the previously introduced tunnel protection interface command enables the VTI feature.

Note Tunnel protection alleviates the need to apply crypto maps to the outside interface.

VTI provides for a routable interface (Interface Tunnel 0) and therefore supports the encryption of IPmc. 
Source:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/V3PNIPmc.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-403"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-403" rel="nofollow">alex</a> :</strong><br />
think so, à vérifier.<br />
Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE
</p></blockquote>
<p>haha mec t&#8217;es pas au points sur tes versions d&#8217;IOS :p<br />
irtual Tunnel Interface</p>
<p>VTI is introduced in Cisco IOS Release 12.3(14)T. A tunnel interface with the new Cisco IOS interface tunnel mode ipsec ipv4 command along with the previously introduced tunnel protection interface command enables the VTI feature.</p>
<p>Note Tunnel protection alleviates the need to apply crypto maps to the outside interface.</p>
<p>VTI provides for a routable interface (Interface Tunnel 0) and therefore supports the encryption of IPmc.<br />
Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/V3PNIPmc.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/V3PNIPmc.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bastien</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>bastien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-416</guid>
		<description>tom pour mettre du GREoIPSEC, tu peux mettre tunnel mode gre au lieux de ipsec ipv4, il me semble que le tunnel protection fonctionnera aussi, juste penser à mettre le TSet en mode transport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom pour mettre du GREoIPSEC, tu peux mettre tunnel mode gre au lieux de ipsec ipv4, il me semble que le tunnel protection fonctionnera aussi, juste penser à mettre le TSet en mode transport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-403</guid>
		<description>think so, à vérifier. 

Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think so, à vérifier. </p>
<p>Mais dfaçon depuis 12.4 les tunnels IPsec gèrent le traffic multicast sans avoir besoin de GRE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.madrouter.com/ipsec-vti/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.madrouter.com/?p=222#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Ohhhhhh ca poutre.
ca fait pareil que du gre dans le tunnel ? (bcast etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhhhh ca poutre.<br />
ca fait pareil que du gre dans le tunnel ? (bcast etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
